Should You File a PCT Application in India via the WIPO route within 31 months?
Imagine you're developing your company's five-year IP strategy for the Indian market. Beyond cost considerations, what potential risks do you see in relying on defensive publication rather than active patent protection?
Consider factors like future licensing opportunities, venture capital interest, and potential partnerships.
In the patent examination process, the patent description often becomes more important and has relevance in defining the scope of the patent claims for several reasons. For processing of patent examination filing of Form 18 / Form 18A is mandatory to proceed to the patent examination stage.
Using Defensive Publications to Block Rivals in 2025
When a company publishes details of their invention in a way that makes it publicly available, it creates "prior art."
This prior art prevents others from obtaining patents on that same invention. In India, publications can be made through various channels including:
The Indian Patent Office's official journal
Technical journals and publications
Company websites or technical disclosure bulletins
Academic papers or conference proceedings
International Companies are increasingly filing via PCT route in India
Companies are increasingly filing via PCT route in India because it gives them 30/31 months from the priority date to make decisions about which countries they want to pursue patent protection in.
By filing through PCT but deliberately not filing a Request for Examination (RFE) in India, companies are creating an interesting competitive dynamic.
India's patent laws require that an RFE must be filed within 48 months from the date of priority. If no RFE is filed, the application is considered withdrawn. However, the PCT application's technical contents become public after 18 months from the priority date.
The new RFE 31 months deadline applies to patent applications filed on or after March 15, 2024. For applications filed on or before March 14, 2024, the due date will remain 48 months from the earliest patent priority date.
While India represents a huge market opportunity, many companies find that the cost and uncertainty of patent litigation in India outweighs the benefits of patent protection.
Consider this example: Let's say a pharmaceutical company develops a new drug formulation.
They might:
File a PCT application covering the invention and enter India under national phase in India
Allow it to publish after 18 months
Actively pursue patents in markets like US, Europe, and Japan
Strategically not file an RFE in India
This approach ensures that while they can't stop others from using their invention in India, neither can competitors patent it and try to block them from the market.
A key consideration is that this strategy requires careful timing and consideration of the business objectives of the technology enterprise.
How would you assess whether the cost savings of this approach outweigh the potential loss of exclusivity rights in a growing market like India?
In emerging technologies like artificial intelligence or green energy, how might the choice between defensive publication and active patent protection in India affect your company's ability to participate in standards-setting or industry collaborations? What opportunities or limitations might arise from each approach?
While India represents a huge market opportunity, many companies find that the cost and uncertainty of patent litigation in India outweighs the benefits of patent protection.
While both patent claims and descriptions are essential components of a patent application, descriptions often take precedence during patent examination due to their role in clarifying the invention details better, and facilitating comparisons with prior art cited by the patent examiner.
Bonus Tip for Patenting: Remember, you can't add new information to your patent invention after you file it, so it's better to include too much detail than too little. Think of everything someone might need to know to understand and make your invention work.
Disclaimer: This information is provided for general educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion. The content discussed regarding defensive publication strategies, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings, and patent examination requests in India represents general observations of potential intellectual property strategies and should not be relied upon as definitive guidance for any specific situation.
Our team
Our strength lies in our individuality. Set up by Advocate Prity Khastgir, the team is dedicated to empowering innovators by simplifying the patent process and ensuring that startups and small businesses can secure their inventions quickly and efficiently.
We focus on facilitating rapid access to patent protection, allowing our IP clients to take advantage of their innovations and succeed in a competitive landscape. With our extensive IP expertise in the fast-track patent process, we are committed to nurturing a dynamic environment of creativity and entrepreneurship, helping our clients bring their ideas to life.
Adv. Prity Khastgir
Registered Patent Attorney since 2007
Adv. Shweta Shalini
Senior Associate
Yashvendra Pandey
Head, Operations
Patenting in India & US
Expert patent searches for innovative business solutions by international patent lawyers and registered patent agents having expertise to perform different patentability searches.
The materials on this website are made available for informational purposes only, and do not constitute legal advice. The receipt of information contained on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PATENT Value PROPOSITION
+91-9312315656
© 2017-2025. All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property Rights SERVICES